73 F
Florida
Tuesday, October 15, 2024
Citizens Journal Florida
HomeNewsworthyPress ReleaseCalifornia Cannot Provide an Accurate List of Who Voted in November 2022.What...

California Cannot Provide an Accurate List of Who Voted in November 2022.What are the implications for November 2024

Family Styles
 
Subscribe Free

Press Release

By Election Integrity Project California

09-28-24


(Editor’s Note: This release is from an election integrity organization in California that has been fighting for fair elections for more than 10 years. What happens in California often is duplicated in other states–particularly battle-ground states that will determine the presidential winner. California voting officials cannot seem to provide a list of valid election voters with the same number of votes cast. Also votes have mysteriously disappeared. Many cases of multiple votes per person have been documented. An analysis of 2022 voting shows only one county out of 58 California counties is able to fully verify all its certified votes with actual voters.)

Santa Clarita, Calif. – A review of the official list of voters and number of votes cast in the CA November 8, 2022 election reveals 43,624 more votes and over 22,000 more voters than the numbers certified by the CA Secretary of State, calling into question the validity of the certification of the 2022 election.


Is this a harbinger of things to come in 2024?


On June 28, 2024 Election Integrity Project®California (EIPCa) obtained from the office of the Secretary of State a list of who voted in California’s November 8, 2022 general election. California’s Election Code §2191 provides qualified groups the right to obtain from elections officials a list of each person who voted in previous elections.


The list contained each voter’s name, address, birthdate, state Registration ID number, voting method and current registration status (active, inactive, pending, cancelled, etc.) Each Registration ID number in VoteCal is unique, and not duplicated.


The list should have been an exact match to the list California certified on December 16, 2022. It was not!


Eligible voters in California should be infuriated!


EIPCa sent a letter with the findings listed by county and the method of voting to the Secretary of State on September 6, requesting a timely response to several questions, but has not yet received a response.


EIPCa analyzed the Secretary’s list and found:


 The number of statewide November 8, 2022 votes provided in the list is 43,624 more votes than certified by the Secretary.
 21,355 voters had two or three votes credited to their respective Registration ID numbers

 If these multi-votes are removed, there were still 22,210 more voters listed than number of votes certified.
 Analyzing the list by county…
o Only one county (Modoc) matched the certified county-level results.
o 32 counties had more votes than certified. Los Angeles County had the bulk of the list’s
excess votes and multi-voting.
o 25 counties had fewer votes than the number certified. It is unclear who cast the “missing” certified votes, as the list contains all who voted in the election even if they were subsequently inactivated or cancelled.


“Election results produced through any process that bends or breaks the “rules” deny all legal voters their voice.” (In re Coy) 127 U.S. 731 (1888)


“EIPCa calls for Secretary of State Weber to perform a full and final reconciliation of the votes counted compared to eligible voters who voted and to develop a ‘who voted’ list as mandated by EC §2191 prior to certification of each future election, starting with the November, 2024 Presidential election.” said EIPCa President Linda Paine.


Election Integrity Project®California (EIPCa) is a nonpartisan nonprofit 501(c)(3) charity.
Contributions are tax-deductibl

Education Crusade
 
Knotty Line Sunglasses
 
Firesail Adventures
RELATED ARTICLES
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Most Popular

 
The Bike Cop

Recent Comments

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x