69.4 F
Florida
Wednesday, December 11, 2024
Citizens Journal Florida
HomeNewsworthyOpinionβ˜•οΈ RISING STARS β˜™ Wednesday, November 13, 2024 β˜™ C&C NEWS 🦠

β˜•οΈ RISING STARS β˜™ Wednesday, November 13, 2024 β˜™ C&C NEWS 🦠

Family Styles
 
Subscribe Free

Opinion

By Jeff Childers

11/13/24

Good morning, C&C, it’s Wednesday! And what a day. The good news keeps coming. In today’s roundup: Republicans secure House, delivering a Trump trifecta and full control of the federal government; Trump’s picks pick up the pace and the new America First government comes into view; former neocons form up ranks forming Trump’s new foreign policy; the latest Trump effect is guaranteed to give you a good day; Obama just blocks Ten Commandments law and tees up possible Supreme Court revolution; and Elon’s Musks star is ascendant, which is probably good news for America.

πŸ—žπŸ’¬ WORLD NEWS AND COMMENTARY πŸ’¬πŸ—ž

πŸ“ˆπŸ“ˆ The Hill ran a terrific story yesterday headlined, β€œRepublicans win House, delivering Trump a trifecta.” It’s not clear yet how big the House majority will be, but it’s over. Trump has his mandate.

image 11.png

Get ready. It only gets better.

πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ Trump’s picks are coming faster now. Forbes ran a roundup story yesterday headlined, β€œTrump’s Cabinet: Here Are His Picks For Key Rolesβ€”Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, Pete Hegseth And More.”

image.png

Apart from the ones I’ve already told you about, here are the latest lists of announced (not rumored) selections through sometime last night:

Corporate media is badly freaking out about that list of deplorables, white supremacists, garbage people, and phobics of various kinds. But it sounds good to me so far! Who’s next?

πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ David Sanger, the New York Times’s β€œNational Security Correspondent” and the voice of the deep-state, ran a thoughtful, cautious story about Trump’s growing list of picks yesterday, headlined β€œOnce They Were Neocons. Now Trump’s Foreign Policy Picks Are All β€˜America First.’” It was good news for all sane people who yearn for peace, though oddly, Sanger seemed slightly alarmed at an expected shift from Biden’s aggressive military intervention and regime change tactics to Trump’s style of β€˜transactional diplomacy.’

image 3.png

The article quoted Pete Hegseth (from 2020) describing how he abandoned his β€œhawkish” military-first foreign policy, developing a more mature, Trumpian worldview based on America First economics rather than clobbering your competitors with a rock while they aren’t looking. In Pete’s words:

image 2.png

Sanger described all of Trump’s foreign policy picks (plus some more rumored ones) as China hawks and Ukraine skeptics (thank goodness), and all as former neocons, who now embrace Trump’s muscular economic approach to foreign policy, also called β€œAmerica First.”

Trump, it seems, has this crazy concept that not killing people makes it easier to do business with them.

The last four years of Biden and his drones of doom or hell drones or scapes or whatever they called it have had the salutary effect of sobering up the Chinese. Biden’s warmongering has made the Chinese much more interested in working things out economically rather than militarily. This puzzling development baffled the Wall Street Journal, which ran a querulous story yesterday headlined, β€œTrump Is Recruiting a Team of China Hawks. So Why Is Beijing Relieved?”

The answer is that Beijing is relieved because they can see Trump eschewing rabid neocons like Mike Pompeo in favor of America Firsters, who prefer to work things out on a spreadsheet rather than a battlefield. Let’s all make money.

Sanger’s story ended on what β€”to himβ€” was a wistful note, a sense of lost longing for the good old days of Viktoria Nuland’s two-color-revolutions-a-month. To me, the final paragraphs were a clarion call for more prosperous and peaceful days ahead:

image 4.png

The world fought Trump’s foreign policy in Trump’s first term. But after four years of Biden’s neocons bringing us to the brink of nuclear annihilation, they are yearning to make a deal.

πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ One of the week’s most encouraging β€œTrump Effect” stories appeared as an editorial in Fast Company, titled β€œRIP DEI. This is what comes next.” In the wake of Trump’s election, the president of a DEI consulting firm said she’s decided to pull the plug, close up shop, shut it down.

image 5.png

The CEO, Amber Cabral, began like this: β€œIt may seem extreme to decide to close my company mere hours after an election result, but let me paint the picture for you.” The colors red and orange featured prominently in Amber’s verbal portrait.

β€œSince late Fall of 2022,” Amber explained, β€œmy industry has been in a major decline.” In other words, things were already headed downhill even before Trump was re-elected. Corporate America was already shifting away from DEI, cutting teams, budgets, and most importantly, outside consultants. The optics were getting really bad. Amber noted that, β€œa lot of DEI practitioners either didn’t have support or flat-out did not know what they were doing.” (Thank you, Matt Walsh.)

Then a couple months ago, Amber’s corporate clients put all pending DEI training sessions on hold. When she asked them why, she got two answers. First, they wanted to wait till β€œafter the election.” Second, they worried that conservative filmmaker Robby Starbuck start tweeting about their DEI activities.

And now that Trump is President, Amber expects those clients to β€œsoon shift from postponed to canceled.”

She isn’t waiting for the body-positive lady to sing. Amber blames Americans who voted for Trump, who β€œdon’t want to listen or be accountable or move through disconnection,” whatever that means. But she admitted that the DEI approach already wasn’t working. β€œThe β€˜let me drown you in the data so you feel guilty enough to change’ approach has been failing.”

Her sad conclusion: β€œIt’s beyond time to put the current model to rest and with it, the clinical definitions, and the constant desire to describe and explain what our preferred diversity, equity, and inclusion acronym means and why it’s the right one. None of this is working.”

β€œI’m okay,” Amber rhetorically sobbed, grappling with her strong emotions, β€œwith letting DEI rest in peace.”

RIP, DEI.

To be clear, the failure of Amber’s DEI-training business was not the good news. As a fellow entrepreneur, I sympathize with Amber, and would encourage her to move on to her next venture quickly. It will be even more successful, and probably a lot more productive, than the last one.

But if DEI consultancies are starting to close, if cowardly corporations are finally jettisoning the profoundly racist and counterproductive ideology in favor of getting back to basics, then we are even closer to winning than we thought.

πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ NBC ran an entirely predictable story yesterday headlined, β€œFederal judge blocks Louisiana’s Ten Commandments law in public schools.”  I reported the story earlier this year after Lousiana’s terrific Governor Jeff Landry signed a provocative bill requiring a poster of the Ten Commandments be displayed in all public school classrooms as a historical document, and Lousiana liberals started coughing up crawdads. What about separation of Church and State??, they cried. And they sued.

image 12.png

U.S. District Judge John deGravelles, a 2014 Obama appointee, held the new Louisiana law was a β€œfacially unconstitutional” violation of the First Amendment’s establishment clause. The plaintiff parents who objected had to go all the way to Salem, Oregon to scare up an expert willing to testify that the Ten Commandments has no place in American history:

image 6.png

But it is simply a fact that Christianity occupies a fundamental place in the founding of the United States. The country was not founded by Muslims, atheists, Hindus, or Flying Spaghetti Monster worshippers. Still, the Founders preserved everyone’s ability to worship β€”or not worshipβ€” according to their personal conscience.

But freedom of worship neither alters history nor invites changing, re-emphasizing, re-imagining, blurring, or mythologizing American history into something different.

The case is soon headed to appeal. It will go to the most conservative appellate circuit in the countryβ€”the Fifth. The Fifth Circuit’s decision will almost surely be appealed to the Supreme Court. I cannot predict whether the Court will take the case, but if it does, there is an opportunity to permanently neuter the ACLU’s anti-religion brigades and maybe even end the need for Satanist statues in state capitals.

The Supreme Court’s stance has shifted in recent years. In Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (2022), the Court reversed the so-called Lemon test, instead adopting a historical analysis of the Establishment Clause. Specifically, the majority in Kennedy upheld a football coach’s on-field prayers before games. The Court was sympathetic to public religious expressions, holding that the Establishment Clause does not require a strict separation of church and state, but rather bars coercive or discriminatory practices.

Who knows how this will shake out, but you couldn’t ask for a better setup. I realize some secular readers remain skeptical, but should be reassured that this fight is less about imposing Christian religious views on anybody, and more about stopping marxist undermining of America’s moral and ethical foundations.

πŸ§‘β€πŸš€πŸ§‘β€πŸš€ Elon Musk, who pretty much bet his farm on Trump’s victory, is now a bright rising star. A series of headlines evidence just how good Elon’s bet was. First, Forbes ran a cautiously excited story yesterday headlined, β€œTrump 2.0 Could Put A Rocket Under SpaceX And The U.S. Space Industry.”

image 7.png

Elon hopes that a Trump-directed EPA will stop making SpaceX survey underground gopher tortoises and free-range porpoises to calculate how much the noise from the company’s spaceship launches bothers them.

In other words, America’s revitalized space program is about to be unleashed. β€œElon, get those rocket ships going because we want to reach Mars before the end of my term,” Trump said in September.

The world’s most transformative technologist is well-positioned to follow through on that astonishing dream. But you just can’t please some people. The New York Times’s top story this morning was headlined, β€œAt Mar-a-Lago, Elon Musk Puts His Imprint on the Trump Transition.” The sub-headline sneered, β€œHe’s on the patio. He’s on the golf course. Everywhere Donald Trump looks, there is the world’s richest man.”

During the pandemic, the Democrats dynamited the space entrepreneur out of the apolitical wilderness. Before that, Elon always minded his own political business. But now, thanks to the Democrats, he’s heavily involved in the day-to-day details:

image 8.png

Yesterday, Elon suggested on Twitter that government employees who waste taxpayer dollars should be fired:

image 9.png

The New York Times found all this β€œgovernment efficiency” talk deeply disturbing. What, pray tell, will happen to all the wealthy progressives who live on government largesse? Homelessness?

The Times was right to worry. The world’s most successful entrepreneur, who has personal experience with being on the wrong end of government weaponization, appears to have become an integral part of Trump’s transition team:

image 10.png

Trump spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt assured The New York Times that Elon and President Trump were β€œgreat friends and brilliant leaders working together to Make America Great Again.”

β€œMr. Musk,” the depressed Times dolefully reported, β€œhelped tank the idea of neoconservatives like Mr. Pompeo winning administration roles.”

Finally, the Washington Post, not to be left behind in the hand-wringing department, ran a fretful cover story this morning headlined, β€œTrump taps Musk, Ramaswamy to oversee β€˜drastic’ changes to U.S. government.” The sub-headline added, β€œThe president-elect described the new commission as a β€˜Manhattan Project’ to dramatically slash regulations, cut staff and β€˜restructure’ federal agencies.”

It could be the Post’s worst nightmare. Because Republicans will control the Presidency, House, and Senate, Musk’s D.O.G.E. proposals could actually be passed, β€œpotentially triggering major repercussions for the U.S. government and millions of federal workers.”

One can hope.

Despite all this wonderfully prpmising news, or perhaps because of it, the WaPo found nothing to like. It derisively dismissed the goal of reining in government as fanciful and absurd. It decried Elon’s conflicts of interest, mocked previous attempts by Republicans to reduce government waste, and snidely re-discovered the massive U.S. debt, which WaPo suddenly believes is simply too big to ever get under control. It’s no use.

We will see. They laughed when Elon cut 75% of Twitter’s staff, too. It’s a new day, and it’s Morning in America.

Have a very wonderful Wednesday! Then get back here tomorrow morning for another entertaining and informative roundup of all the fast-breaking, essential news and commentary.

Twitter: jchilders98.
Truth Social: jchilders98.
MeWe: mewe.com/i/coffee_and_covid.
Telegram: t.me/coffeecovidnews
C&C Swag! www.shopcoffeeandcovid.com


The views expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Citizens Journal Florida

Education Crusade
 
Knotty Line Sunglasses
 
Firesail Adventures
 
 Christ Presbyterian Church
 
RELATED ARTICLES
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Most Popular

 
The Bike Cop

Recent Comments

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x